01 An Expert Finder for big companies

Confr finds who in your company has the answer — and writes you the report.

Stop chasing answers through endless meetings. Ask Confr one hard question — "Why are sales dropping in the South?". Confr sends private chats on Microsoft Teams. Each person points to the next, until we reach the source. You get the ground-level truth in one written report — every line cited.

For the buyer. Built in the EU · Works council ready For the team. Anonymous · Opt-in · Skip any question
Live · investigation in progress
QUESTION Why are sales dropping in the South? FROM · M. OKAFOR · CEO LC Liam SALES · SOUTH "Stock never gets to us." PS Priya WAREHOUSE "There's a WMS rule…" MB Marcus REGION · SOUTH "Banner is wrong." REPORT INV-204 · RULE OF 3 HELD ✓ A 2024 routing rule sends stock to the Midlands first. 22 INTERVIEWS · 9 SOURCES
02 The problem

Six months. Three steering committees. And you still cannot say why.

In a big company, the answer lives in hundreds of inboxes, spreadsheets and shift conversations. No one person has all of it. Ask openly and people clam up. Ask quietly and you never reach the people who actually know.

What your dashboard tells you

Numbers · trends · symptoms
Revenue · South region
−18%
vs. last quarter
Revenue, Midlands+4%
National stock levelsHealthy
Supplier on-time deliveryOn-target

Every other number is green. Customers are still complaining.

What your dashboard doesn't tell you

Why · who knows · what happened
It's not a stock problem. A computer rule changed last year. Now every delivery from suppliers goes to the central warehouse first — and never makes it down to the South. The store managers got tired of empty shelves and stopped re-ordering. Sales collapsed. No one had connected the three things before. — Confr · INV-204 · 22 interviews · 9 artifacts
03 How Confr works

Watch a real investigation, step by step.

A live example. The CEO of a 2,400-person retailer asks one question. Five stages later, the boardroom has an answer — with receipts.

01 / 05 The CEO writes the question Confr launcher · plain English
From · M. Okafor (CEO) · Northwind Retail New investigation
We're losing sales in the South. We suspect there isn't enough merchandise in the local warehouses to meet demand. How can this be happening — and where is the actual bottleneck?
Tier · auto-detected Deep Starting respondents · 3 Refusal pre-check · ✓ no named individuals Launch →
02 / 05 Confr messages 3 people, privately Microsoft Teams · in private · in parallel
LC
Liam Carter
Sales Lead · South
Confr
Hi Liam — South numbers have shifted and we're hoping you can help us understand why. 12 minutes when you have it? Anonymous to your manager. Skip any question.
Sure.Seen · 11:04
Are you currently turning customers away because something isn't on the shelf?↳ probe · weekly cadence
PS
Priya Shah
Warehouse Ops · Cardiff
Confr
Hi Priya — we're trying to understand how stock flows to the South. You'd know better than us. Quick 10-min chat? Anonymous to managers.
Go for it.Seen · 11:06
When supplier deliveries arrive, who decides which warehouse gets what share?
MB
Marcus Bell
Regional Director · South
Confr
Hi Marcus — South revenue's been sliding and we'd value your read. 12 minutes when you can? You can decline any question.
Frankly, yes. It's been my problem for six months.Seen · 11:08
When your store managers can't get stock, what do they do?
03 / 05 Each person points us to someone else — we ask them too 3 → 9 people · 6 new chats open
Liam Carter
Sales · South
"Stock never gets to us."
Priya Shah
Warehouse · Cardiff
"WMS rule from 2024."
Marcus Bell
Regional Dir · South
"Banner is wrong."
Sam Doyle
Store Mgr · Bristol
"Stopped re-ordering 3 mo ago."
Aisha Yusuf
Forecasting
"Allocation rule never reviewed."
Tom Bridger
WMS Admin
"Midlands gets first pick."
Hana Le
Supplier Coord.
"Inbound volumes are normal."
R. Singh
Ops Tooling
"Banner only reads Midlands."
J. Marrow
Store Mgr · Exeter
"Saw the banner — gave up."
9 PEOPLE · 6 BRANCH CONVERSATIONS · 4 INDEPENDENT VOICES ON THE SAME ROUTING RULE
04 / 05 The rule of three: every cause checked three ways 22 people helped · 3 findings · 2 possible · 2 dropped
Finding · 95% int-04, 09, 12 · art-03
A 2024 WMS rule sends stock to Midlands first — never reviewed since.
Finding · 90% int-08, 11, 19 · art-07
"National low-stock" banner reads Midlands only — South managers see false signals.
Finding · 85% int-06, 14, 20 · art-11
South store managers stopped re-ordering after seeing the banner.
Possible · 40% int-15, 22
Anomaly in the Exeter store rota — passed two checks. Couldn't find a second source.
Possible · 30% int-09, 17
Supplier lead-time variance possibly contributing — partial evidence only.
Dropped int-19 · names individual
A claim about a named regional manager — failed our "no targeting individuals" rule.
Dropped int-04 · names individual
A claim about a named buyer — failed our "no targeting individuals" rule.
05 / 05 The CEO opens the report 5 days · €183 · rule of 3 held · 2 dropped (visible)
INV-204 · DEEP · NORTHWIND RETAIL RULE OF 3 HELD ✓

Sales are dropping in the South — are our warehouses understocked, or is something else going on?

A 2024 routing rule sends supplier deliveries to the Midlands first1. The national-stock banner reads the Midlands hub only2. South store managers stopped re-ordering when their shelves stayed empty3. Sales collapsed. Stock never followed.

Interviews
22
Findings
3 + 2 unv
Time
5 days
Cost
€183
01 / 05 · The CEO writes the question
04 What people use Confr for

Three sizes — by how hard the question is.

Deep is the hard, political question that's been bouncing around for months. Standard documents what one person knows before they leave. Quick answers one specific question.

Deep Root-cause · ~5 days Standard Document a process · ~3 days Quick One specific answer · ~2 days
Deep22 interviews5 days
BOTTLENECK SUPPLIER → … → STORE

Sales are dropping in the South — are our warehouses understocked, or is something else going on?

Deep52 interviews6 days
REVENUE ↑ EBITDA ↓

Why is our EBITDA margin slipping in EMEA despite revenue growth?

Deep40 interviews5 days
CHURN PEAK · YR 2

Why are we losing our top 10% performers in their second year?

Standard11 interviews3 days
INTAKE REVIEW SIGN-OFF REPORT FRAUD-REVIEW PROCESS

Map our entire fraud-review process before the SME goes on parental leave.

Standard14 interviews3 days
UK IE CUSTOMS 5 SYSTEMS · 4 TEAMS

Document how a UK→Ireland customs declaration actually moves through our systems.

Quick8 interviews2 days
R&D WHAT DOES "INNOVATION" MEAN?

What does our R&D team actually mean when they say "innovation"?

06 Four promises

Four rules. Each visible in the report.

No fine print. No "trust the AI." Every promise leaves a stamp on the deliverable, so you can check it.

Nothing on one source.

Every claim is checked three independent ways before it lands as a finding: our own rules, a second pair of eyes, and a test designed to prove it wrong. Three voices saying the same thing in process work; three checks in root-cause work. Same promise either way.

Receipts on every claim.

Every line in the report links to a quote or a file. Nothing without a source — and nothing comes from the model alone.

If we rule something out, we show why.

Every cause we set aside or rule out comes with the reason written down. No quiet dismissals. If we couldn't get to the evidence, we tell you what we'd have needed and where we got stuck.

We find it. You decide what to do with it.

No vendor recommendations. No autopilot. No "based on this, you should." We find what's true. The decisions stay with you.

07 Who Confr is for

Built for big companies. The bigger, the better.

Below 50 people, we can't keep voices private — there aren't enough people for anonymity to mean anything. Above that, we get more useful the bigger you are.

Sweet spot: 500 to 5,000 people.

Big enough that nobody has the whole picture. Spread out enough that what one team knows, another doesn't. Political enough that asking openly skews the answer.

EU-built. GDPR by default. Designed with works council approval in mind: every investigation has an opt-in flow, an audit trail, and a refusals log that records categories — not the names of who refused.

If you have fewer than 50 employees, we'll tell you up front. The product won't help you.

08 What Confr is not

So you don't waste a call.

Not engagement surveys.

No NPS, no scores, no "how do you feel about leadership."

Not a chatbot for your staff.

It runs on demand, for one specific question, then stops.

Not for evaluating individuals.

If the question is about a named person, we refuse it.

Not a tool recommender.

We find the root cause. We don't pitch software.

Not for < 50 people.

There aren't enough voices to keep anyone private. We'll tell you up front.

Not autopilot.

A reviewer at Confr reads every report before it ships.

09 Pricing

Free to start. Then just what the AI costs us, plus 30%.

No seat licenses. No platform fees. No annual commit. You pay what the AI costs us, plus 30% so we can keep building.

Free tier
€0first investigation

Your first investigation is on us. Up to 10 interviews. Quick or Standard tier. Real report. No credit card.

After that · Pay-as-you-go
AI cost + 30%no other fees

We pass through what the AI costs us — priced per token — with a 30% margin on top. That's it. No subscription, no minimum, no platform fee.

Per million tokensOur costYou pay
Input tokens€10 / M€13 / M
Output tokens€43.75 / M€56.88 / M
Examples What a typical investigation works out to
Quick · 5–10 interviews · ~2 days~€7
Standard · 10–20 interviews · ~3 days~€20
Deep · 25–40 interviews · ~5 days~€60

Examples only — not fixed prices. You pay for the tokens your investigation actually uses, at the rate above. A bigger one costs more; a smaller one costs less.

Itemised on every invoice — the exact tokens your investigation used, plus 30%.

10 Honest answers

The questions we get on every call.

Will my people actually talk to a bot?+
More than they talk to people. In our pilots, 87% of invited employees took the call. Most said it was easier than talking to a manager — there's no eye contact, no career risk, no follow-up. They can hang up. They can edit. They can refuse a question. Most of them don't.
What if our works council says no?+
We expect that conversation. Confr is built in the EU and designed with works council approval in mind. Every investigation has an opt-in flow, an audit trail, a refusals log that records categories rather than names, and a refusal protocol for any question that targets a named individual. We'll join the works council meeting if you want us to.
How do you keep findings actually anonymous?+
Two ways, both built on the same rule: nothing on one source. In process work — when we map how something is done — a finding only appears if at least three independent people said the same thing. In root-cause work — when we answer one hard question — every cause is checked three ways before it becomes a finding: our own rules (built-in checks the AI can't skip), a second pair of eyes (an independent reviewer reads the evidence and the claim and has to agree), and trying to prove it wrong (a test designed to break the cause; if it survives, it stands). Below that bar, the claim moves to a "Possible" section so you can see it's there without acting on it — or it's dropped, with the reason visible. People are cited by their role and where they work — never by name.
What happens if only one person knows the answer?+
We capture it as a finding — by name, with their consent. If one person is the only one who knows, that's a "what if they leave?" risk. The report flags it so you can decide whether to document the process, hire a backup, or just accept the risk.
How long does it take?+
Quick: about 2 days. Standard: about 3 days. Deep: about 5 days. The time isn't the AI — interviews are scheduled around your people's calendars, and a reviewer at Confr reads every report before it ships. We don't compress that.
Can you investigate a specific person?+
No. If the question is "is X underperforming," we refuse and redirect you to your performance process. If it's "is X corrupt," we redirect to a whistleblower channel. We will help you re-scope to a process question that doesn't single anyone out.
Where does the data live?+
EU. Encrypted at rest and in transit. Aggregated, anonymised findings stay in your knowledge corpus until you ask us to remove them.
What if it produces nothing useful?+
It happens. Sometimes the evidence doesn't all point one way. When that happens, we don't pretend. We show you every possible cause we looked at, how likely each one is, what we ruled out and why, and what evidence would have closed the gap. You see the whole search — not a guess. The first investigation is free precisely so you can test this without risk.
Can I see a real report before I commit?+
Yes — the full sample is here. It's a real-shape Deep-tier deliverable from an anonymised customer.

One hard question.
One real report. Free.

Tell us the question your last three steering committees couldn't crack. We'll run the investigation. You don't pay until the second one.

EU-built · Works council ready · 50+ FTE · Free first investigation